Attorney

What is Considered a Hate Crime in California?

May 04, 2017 by Seppi Esfandi in Attorney  Criminal Defense   Leave a Comment
Thumbnail for: What is Considered a Hate Crime in California?

Hate Crime: Defined as a Bias

The main purpose of hate crime laws, as incorporated under various California Penal Code sections, is to deter threats, violence and other violations, including civil rights violations, against an individual, based on the individual’s real or perceived characteristics, against which the defendant holds some bias.

It is this “bias”, whether it be a racial bias, a nationality bias, etc, that causes the defendant to perform an action, which is the mainstay of the particular charge, under the various types of hate crimes under the criminal statute. In particular, sections of the Code that address hate crimes include PC §§ 422.55, 422.56, 422.57, 422.6, and 422.75. Furthermore, the Government Code specifically addresses the “disability” element.

“Characteristics” that typically motivate hate crimes (noted in law):

  • Disability
  • Gender
  • Nationality
  • Race or ethnicity
  • Religion
  • Sexual orientation
  • Associating with a group or an individual mentioned above
  • Hate crime also refers to bias-motivated property destruction

The Three Types of Hate Crimes:

  1. Interference with Civil Rights by Force
  2. Interference with Civil Rights by Threat
  3. Interference with Civil Rights by Damaging Property

1. Interference with Civil Rights by Force

The prosecutor charges a defendant with this crime where the prosecutor can show that the defendant forcefully interfered with someone else’s civil rights, as protected under the California Constitution and state laws, and / or under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt for the prosecution is to prove each of the following elements:

  • Force was used by the accused in order to willfully interfere with, or to harm, intimidate or oppress, the rights or enjoyment of rights secured by the laws and Constitution of California and / or the United States; and
  • The interference, harm, intimidation or oppression described in the first element was motivated to whatever extent (“in whole or in part”) by the real or perceived disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or association with people having the listed characteristics; and
  • The intention of the accused was to interfere with another person’s rights as protected by law.

The following questions deal with some of the pertinent issues dealt with under all hate crimes in California:

What is a “willful” act?

A willful act is committed by someone who does the act in question willingly or on purpose. The same definition applies to all hate crimes that use the term “willful” defined under relevant California statutes in the Penal Code.

What is a “disability” for purposes of proving a hate crime?

“Disability” refers to either a physical or a mental disability. However, for purposes of hate crimes, the Government Code has provided very specific terminology, which is outlined here:

A person has a “physical disability” when the person has a physiological disease or disorder or condition or cosmetic disfigurement or anatomical (physical) loss, like a lost limb. This physical state of the person affects at least one of the following bodily systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, sensory (mostly the special sense organs), respiratory (and included here are speech organs), cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin or endocrine systems.

A “mental disability” occurs when a person has either a mental or a psychological condition that limits a significant life activity. This term includes mental retardation, organic brain syndrome and emotional or mental illness. It also includes learning disabilities.

How broad is the term “nationality”?

For purposes of this crime, the term nationality includes citizenship, country of origin, and national origin.

Is a belief in atheism also included under “religion”?

Yes. All aspects of religion are included and protected under this broad terminology. Any kind of religious observance and practice comes under this term. This includes agnosticism and atheism.

If you are accused of this crime, is it necessary for the prosecution to also show that you “knew” that you were violating someone else’s rights? Or, is it enough to simply do an act that violates rights of another?

It is sufficient to do the act that violates the rights of another – even if your defense is that you didn’t know you were violating the law. The courts have addressed this particular issue and have said that as long as the right itself is specifically protected under the laws of the United States, it is sufficient for the prosecution simply to show that you intended to invade some interest that is protected under the Constitution, of either the state of California or the United States, or under some statute. That you had awareness of violating the law when you did the act is therefore not important.

If I attempted a hate crime but did not complete it, can I still be charged?

Yes. As long as the prosecution can show circumstantial evidence of your intent to interfere with someone’s rights and an action that is directly connected to one of the hate crimes (even if unsuccessfully perpetrated), you can be charged with an attempted hate crime and punished, though not as severely as if you had completed the crime in full.

2. Interference with Civil Rights by Threat

Someone accused under this offense has threatened to use violence against the victim. Many of the elements required to prove this crime are replicated as under “Misdemeanor Interference with Civil Rights by Force” (above). The prosecution has the burden of proving all five of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt in order to charge a person with this crime:

  • The accused used a threat of violent force against another person; and
  • Any reasonable person subject to this threat would be fearful because it seemed as if the accused was willing and able to act on the threat made; and
  • The accused used the threat made to willfully interfere with or harm or intimidate or oppress the rights or enjoyment of rights secured by the laws and Constitution of California and / or the United States; and
  • The interference, harm, intimidation or oppression described in the first element was motivated to whatever extent (“in whole or in part”) by the real or perceived disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or association with people having the listed characteristics; and
  • The intention of the accused was to interfere with another person’s rights as protected by law

3. Interference with Civil Rights by Damaging Property

This type of hate crime requires a showing of property damage as a form of civil rights interference, and because of bias motivated by characteristics associated with hate crimes, as dealt with in the definition of the elements of hate crimes above and also in the following sections. Some of the elements already seen in hate crimes above are replicated again here.

For this type of crime, the prosecution must show the following five elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • The person accused of this crime defaced, or damaged, or destroyed real property or personal property which is owned or used, or in the possession of, or occupied by someone else; and
    The person accused knew that the property in question belonged to, was in the possession of, or occupied by the victim of the crime; and
  • The reason why the accused acted this way was to interfere with, or to intimidate the victim’s rights or enjoyment of rights secured by the laws and Constitution of California and / or the United States; and
  • The interference, harm, intimidation or oppression described in the first element was motivated to whatever extent (“in whole or in part”) by the real or perceived disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or association with people having the listed characteristics; and
  • The intention of the accused was to interfere with another person’s rights as protected by law

Does the victim of this kind of property destruction or other forms of damage need to also be the owner the property?

No. Even if the relevant code section on point, PC § 422.6(b) uses the phrase “property of any other person” (emphasis added) to describe property of the victim, the meaning is much broader than simply ownership. The courts have solved this issue by noting that, as long as the victim has frequently used or possessed or occupied the property in question, or that the property can be readily associated with the victim, this is sufficient for proving the property element of this crime. Interestingly, a classroom has been found to be “property” for purposes of hate crimes based on its frequent use by students.

Possible Defenses

1. Since the bias motivation element is critical as an element for each of the hate crimes, if the prosecution fails to connect your action to a bias motivated by one of the characteristics associated with hate crimes, you cannot be charged with this crime. ( You might however be charged with another crime, depending on evidence of criminal intent and certain actions).

2. Freedom of speech, as long as the speech was not “fighting words”. This means that if you claim First Amendment protection for having used words that are likely to cause violence in the person to whom they are addressed, your defense will fail. There is no social value in such words that might consequently merit constitutional protection. The cases dealing with this highly complex issue, where freedom of the individual as far as speech collide head-on with protection of rights of diverse members of society, have shown that if punishing you for your intimidating words or acts would result in punishing the content of your message, you might be successful in asserting a First Amendment defense. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992)

Possible Punishment

If the prosecution is successful in proving its case, then punishment can be as follows, depending on the circumstances and acts particular to the case in question:

If you are charged with a misdemeanor hate crime, you may receive a prison sentence of a maximum of one year, monetary punishment to a maximum of $5,000 and possible additional mandatory community service hours.

If charged as a felony, you may receive a prison sentence to a maximum of three years and possibly further monetary penalties.

Call Us for a FREE Case Review: 310-274-6529

Seppi Esfandi is an Expert in Criminal Law who has over 16 years of practice defending a variety of criminal cases.

Read our Testimonials

Criminal Defense Help

  • Will a California DUI Impact My Life in the Long Term?

    Will a California DUI Impact My Life in the Long Term?

    Most people think of a DUI as something that is not serious, when in fact, a California DUI is a very serious offense. It is not something that will result in a slap on the wrist. You are better off obtaining an experienced DUI attorney if you want to protect your future, and your reputation.... Read More »
  • Domestic Violence Stats:  Nationwide, California & Los Angeles

    Domestic Violence Stats: Nationwide, California & Los Angeles

    Introduction First of all, if you are the accused in a Domestic Violence case, it is recommended that you contact a qualified Domestic Violence Defense Attorney about the details of your case. Domestic violence is loosely defined as a “spectrum”, and often a “pattern of behaviors” that include physical, sexual, verbal, emotional, and psychological abuse,... Read More »
  • Los Angeles Jails, California Prisons Failing: Corruption and Overcrowding

    Los Angeles Jails, California Prisons Failing: Corruption and Overcrowding

    Former Los Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca stands in front of an overcrowded Los Angeles jail cell. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison on May 12th, 2017 for attempting to cover up evidence of inmate abuse during an FBI investigation. Corruption and Inmate Abuse In 2011, the FBI started a covert investigation into... Read More »
  • Employment After a Felony Conviction

    Employment After a Felony Conviction

    Avoid a Felony at All Cost A felony conviction can be devastating to your search for gainful employment, as most reputable companies and desired job positions will merit some form of background check. Depending on the nature of your felony, there are certain jobs that can be impossible to get. For instance, if you have... Read More »
  • Were You the Victim of an ‘Unlawful Police Stop’?

    Were You the Victim of an ‘Unlawful Police Stop’?

    Police Misconduct The stakes can be high in a police stop — why and how the law enforcement officer stops you, and how the officer discovers something during the stop, is every bit as important as what they discover. Often the search and seizure process will determine whether someone is allowed to carry on with... Read More »
  • Can I Own a Gun if I’m a Marijuana User?

    Can I Own a Gun if I’m a Marijuana User?

    Federal Law When purchasing a gun, you are required to fill out Federal “Firearms Transactions Record” Form (ATF Form 4473), where question 11e specifically inquires about your current drug usage. If you take marijuana medically or recreationally, and answer this question honestly, you will be disqualified from purchasing the gun. “Are you an unlawful user... Read More »
  • Knowing Your Rights: What to do If You Are Being Arrested

    Knowing Your Rights: What to do If You Are Being Arrested

    What to do If You Are Being Arrested This article focuses on what you should do if you are being placed under arrest by a police officer. We will discuss 10 basic rules to follow when you are being arrested: Don’t get angry Remain Silent Don’t agree to a search Ask to Contact Your Attorney... Read More »
  • How to Get Someone Out of Jail

    How to Get Someone Out of Jail

    California Bail Bonds Let’s face it, jail is a dangerous place. If your loved one needs help getting out of jail in these Southern California counties: Los Angeles County Riverside County Ventura County San Bernardino County Orange County We are more than happy to assist you. In some instances we can help in Las Vegas... Read More »

Gerardo C.

Seppi was amazing, one of the nicest persons I've met. He was very professional and handled my case like so. He assured me from the beginning what he was going to be able to do for me and always was truthful. He always answered my phone calls and when he didn't he would respond to my voicemails promptly as well communicate via text. The fees were very reasonable. I never had to go to court and he fixed everything for me. I will definitely recommend him to my friends and family.

Anthony M.

I was facing 2 felony counts which included 2 strikes on my record. Each count was a sentence of 2-4 years in state prison. I was looking at 2 counts which could have sent me to jail for a maximum of 8 years. The DA was trying to offer me a lesser misdemeanor charge and Mr. Esfandi advised me to deny their offer and he assured me of a better outcome. MY CASE WAS DISMISSED! I told my girlfriend this is a blessing from God, and she said no it wasn't, you had a great lawyer! Thank you Seppi for doing an outstanding job. You saved my life!

Evan N.

This was the first time that I had to choose an attorney for anything. I am very thankful that I end up choosing Seppi Esfandi. The outcome of my brothers case was perfect and beyond fair with no jail time! I believe that without Seppi, my brother would had definitely been charged with a felony and served jail time. My family is extremely pleased with the professionalism that the Law Office of Seppi Esfandi had provided during the case. The paralegal, Jorge, was very friendly, professional, and I could immediately tell that they cared about our family situation. THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN!

Courtney M.

I've never been in a situation where I needed a lawyer before. Seppi has been highly communicative, proactive and knowledgeable as well as affordable. He is very personable and listens to you, as well as makes you feel comfortable with the process. I felt such relief after choosing him. The best part? He got my case dismissed! I highly recommend him.

Amber B.

Meeting with Seppi Esfandi was the first step in the right direction after a big setback. He is professional, honest, generous, and has passion for what he does. He quickly and effectively answered every single question I had regarding my case and went above and beyond to help me. Esfandi did not stop fighting for me until he saw results in my case - I am so appreciative and grateful for all of his dedication and passion.

Carrie P.

Seppi was the first attorney I have ever hired and will be the only one I ever hire! My kids father was looking at 4 years prison and he got him down to 180 days and back to probation. So instead of prison time he is staying in county to only serve around 90 days. There were more then one cases and even though Seppi could've have charged more to help extra he made sure the other case was done right. He was very attentive and caring and didn't have very bad pricing considering. Thank you so much Seppi!

Miguel T.

I was facing two felony charges Seppi was able to bring it down to a 1 misdemeanor, the other charge was dropped, i did not have to do any jail time and I did not have register. I'm very pleased with Seppi's help and also Jorge who was there from the day I called. I would highly recommend Seppi if you are in need of any legal help.

Cindy F.

Seppi and Shaun were by far the nicest people I have dealt with. I had a complicated situation with terrible prosecutors thinking just because I had a DUI, it automatically makes me a loser, a drunk, a terrible person - we all make mistakes. Seppi was able to get my case dismissed at one courthouse, and at the second was able to have me get the minimum sentence. I was scared from the get-go, but he was very supportive, especially after my mom passed. I would recommend Seppi and the Firm to my family/friends (heaven forbid they ever end up in my situation).

Britney D.

Seppi was awesome. He will answer his phone at 10pm on a Saturday or any other time you need him. The decision to hire him was obvious. I've never been in legal trouble before and he made me feel very comfortable and assured throughout the entire situation. I actually relocated to northern California before the case ended and he was able to handle everything for me from a distance. I did not have to fly back to LA once. As far as LA lawyers go I found him priced at the going rate and money very well spent. I cannot not speak for more serious offenders, but for my situation, it was perfect.

Johanna D.

Seppi was great. He helped me get through one of the most stressful and frightening moments in my life. He answered nearly every question I had & if he was unable to answer at the moment, he made sure to follow-up with me as soon as he had the answer and/or information I needed. Since this was my first time ever in a legal situation, I was scared and confused. Seppi definitely helped me get through it. With his willingness to listen to me and with his expertise, I felt comforted & at ease knowing I had his assistance.

Amanda P.

Seppi is the best lawyer!! I was charged with a felony and he told me that it was a felony strike but that he would work hard for me. I knew to get him on my case because of the way he presented himself, i could tell he was a good lawyer. my case got dismissed after he went to court with me a few times. I am so thankful to Seppi for helping me.

Defense Expertise

Recent Victories

Loading Quotes...

Videos:  Criminal Defense Attorney Seppi Esfandi

Best law firms