History of The Electric Chair
In the annals of criminal justice, few methods of execution have stirred as much controversy as the electric chair. Developed in the late 19th century as an alternative to hanging, the electric chair was intended to provide a more humane and efficient means of capital punishment. However, its implementation has been marred by botched executions and debates over its constitutionality. This article delves into the history of the electric chair, exploring its origins, legal battles, and the ethical questions surrounding its use.
Origins of the Electric Chair
The idea of using electricity as a method of execution emerged in the 1880s, during a period of intense rivalry between Thomas Edison’s direct current (DC) and George Westinghouse’s alternating current (AC) systems. Edison, a staunch advocate of DC, saw an opportunity to tarnish AC’s reputation by associating it with the electric chair. In 1887, he staged a public demonstration in which a large elephant were electrocuted using AC, aiming to showcase its alleged dangers. The stunt backfired for Edison and was seen merely as a horrifying spectacle of animal cruelty. Many wished Edison himself were the one being electrocuted, instead of the poor innocent animal.
The Birth of Electrocution as Punishment
In response to growing concerns over the cruelty of hanging, the state of New York passed a law in 1888 establishing electrocution as the official method of execution. This decision was influenced by the lobbying efforts of Edison, who hoped that associating AC with the electric chair would deter consumers from adopting Westinghouse’s technology. The stage was set for the first electric chair execution in 1890.
Dr. Southwick had worked for a decade to change the national mode of execution from hanging and firing squad to electrocution. He argued that hanging was “clumsy” by comparison. Electrocution was much more “advanced”.
William Kemmler’s Execution
On August 6, 1890, William Kemmler became the first person to be executed by the electric chair in the United States. His case attracted widespread attention and was closely followed by the media. Kemmler’s execution, however, did not go as planned. The initial application of electric current failed to kill him, leading to a second, more powerful jolt. The gruesome scene that unfolded in the execution chamber shocked witnesses and sparked debates about the humaneness of electrocution.
Minutes after the first electric chair execution in the summer of 1890, Dr. Alfred Southwick, a Buffalo, NY, dentist, proudly told the assemblage of witnesses, “This is the culmination of 10 years work and study! We live in a higher civilization.”
The execution had taken a mere 17 seconds. A few moments later though, the prison warden noticed the prisoner’s “chest begin to heave,” and another screamed, “Oh my God! He’s breathing!” The warden ordered the current restarted. It took two minutes for the full charge of 2,000 volts to rebuild while the prisoner gulped for breath. Several witnesses left the room as the prisoner frothed at the mouth and moaned. “Smoke became visible” coming from the top of his head, and “the smell of burning flesh” filled the room. It took another 70 seconds before the current was finally cut off and the prisoner declared dead. – Daniel Demers
Legal Challenges and Controversies
The use of the electric chair as a method of execution has faced numerous legal challenges throughout its history. One of the landmark cases was In re Kemmler, in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of electrocution, stating that it was not a form of cruel and unusual punishment. However, dissenting opinions argued that the botched execution of Kemmler demonstrated the inherent cruelty of the electric chair.
Debate over Effectiveness and Humaneness
The efficacy and humaneness of the electric chair have been subjects of intense debate. Proponents argue that it provides a quick and relatively painless death, while opponents point to instances of botched executions and the potential for prolonged suffering. The lack of scientific studies on the experience of death by electrocution has fueled these debates, leaving the true impact of the electric chair uncertain.
Technological Advancements
Over the years, advancements in technology have influenced the design and operation of the electric chair. Modifications have been made to improve its efficiency and reduce the risk of botched executions. However, these advancements have not fully resolved concerns about the potential for pain and suffering during electrocution.
Decline of the Electric Chair
In recent decades, the use of the electric chair as a method of execution has declined significantly. Lethal injection has become the preferred method in many states, as it is perceived as more humane. However, some states still maintain the electric chair as an alternative method of execution, ready to be used if lethal injection is deemed unconstitutional or unavailable.
International Perspectives
The use of the electric chair as a method of execution is not limited to the United States. Other countries, such as Belarus and Zimbabwe, have also employed electrocution in carrying out capital punishment. The international community has raised concerns about the human rights implications of using the electric chair, urging countries to abolish this form of execution.
Calls for Abolition
The controversies surrounding the electric chair have fueled calls for its abolition. Advocacy groups, legal experts, and human rights organizations argue that the potential for pain and suffering inherent in electrocution violates the principles of human dignity and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. These voices continue to push for the elimination of the electric chair as a method of execution.
The Future of the Electric Chair
As the debate over the death penalty and methods of execution continues, the future of the electric chair remains uncertain. Its historical significance, coupled with ongoing legal and ethical challenges, ensures that the electric chair will remain a subject of scrutiny and controversy in discussions about capital punishment.
Conclusion
The history of the electric chair is a testament to the complexities and moral dilemmas inherent in the administration of justice. From its origins as a technological innovation to its controversial use in carrying out capital punishment, the electric chair has sparked debates about the nature of punishment, the limits of humaneness, and the protection of human rights. As society grapples with these questions, the fate of the electric chair hangs in the balance, symbolizing the ongoing struggle to reconcile the demands of justice with the principles of compassion and dignity.
- Related Articles:
- Wrongful Execution: The Tragic Flaw of the American Death Penalty System
- California Senate Bill 300: Reforming the Death Penalty
- PC 187 Murder
Need an Attorney? CALL NOW: 310-274-6529
Seppi Esfandi is an Expert Attorney who has over 22 years of practice defending a variety of cases.
